"Bill D. Casselberry" wrote: > ;^) I think even Aaron, our "green instigator" would agree! I do. The Fuji 1600 HG is only good when compared to the Konica 3200. I think that the current limits of high-quality colour neg technology top out at 800-1000. If you're trying to match Portra 160, take Fuji's NHG, which is a lower contrast 800 speed film. On the other hand, if you want to shoot Supra 100 and Supra 800, they'd probably be a better match as a pair of films. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 160) J. Hein
- Re: Fuji 1600, golfer's delight! Bill D. Casselberry
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Port... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 16... Frank Theriault
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Port... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with ... Frank Theriault
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go w... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to... tom
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast fil... Frank Theriault
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast fil... Frank Theriault
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Fuji 1600 (was: Fast film to go with Porta 16... SudaMafud

