I have a friend with the M35/2.8 and I have the Super Takumar 35/3.5 which is supposed to be the same optically as the K35/3.5 (except no SMC) and the Super Tak is definitely a better lens, though the M35 is not bad. If you can find the K35 at a good price, I would pick it up. I'm still looking for one myself, I got the Super Tak because the K is so scarce, and I haven't regretted it at all.
William in Utah. 12/10/2002 4:06:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I do not need AF! I just want to have great 35mm lens. I own M35/2.8 and probably K >35mm are better... Any opinion? >Alek > >Użytkownik Bob Rapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >>Only if you need auto focus. The 35 f3.5 is in a league of its own - try and >>buy one in the K mount! >> >>Bob Rapp >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:49 PM >>Subject: Re: Re: Who has switched to Pentax and why? >> >> >>Is FA 35/2.0 better than highly recommended K35/2.0 and K35/3.5 lenses?Which >>is the best? >>Alek >>Użytkownik Dan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >>>On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 08:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>> FA35/2.0 which is probably very good. >>>> Alek >>>> >>> >>>No _probably_ about it Alek. Just, "FA35/2.o which is very good". <vbg> >>> >>> >>>Dan Scott >>> >>--------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a----------------- >> >>Masz dość płacenia prowizji bankowi ? >>mBank - załóż konto >>http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank >> >***************r-e-k-l-a-m-a************** > >Masz dość płacenia prowizji bankowi ? >mBank - załóż konto >http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank > > >
