----- Original Message ----- From: Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:26 AM Subject: Re[6]: A new DSLR standard emerging? (WAS: Re: Nikon DX lenses: Is this what Pentax is up to?)
> Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Your argument as why not go up to a 20X24 falls back into this > compromise area. For many people, 35mm is a reasonable compromise. > For some, medium format is a reasonable compromise and for a few, > large format is a reasonable compromise.< > > reread William's statement that caused my first response. short summary: > "larger automatically means better". Actually, I said: "Larger negatives are about superior image quality (granularity, definition, etc), and ease of getting quality results. Nothing else." No where did I say better. Better is relative. Within the context that I gave, your above misinformed statement is pretty specious. William Robb
