No, CMOS is cheaper- it's the more common process these days. R
Quoting Glen O'Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Cotty, > > Not sure I understand. Isn't the CMOS more expensive? > > Glen > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:18 PM > To: Pentax List > Subject: Re: Cmos was: Hypothetical Question > > > >So is the CMOS gathering data in a similar fashion as > >a CCD,but with out the CCD?One BIG digital problem with the > >CCD is dust on the filter.Is this now eliminated or greatly reduced > >with CMOS. > >I know i will eventually have to or want to upo grade from > >the 2.74 megapixel to a higher unit.Just not sure what is > >better or more stable,CMOS or CCD. > >Cotty, i beleive you mentioned shooting soccer was not a problem > >with the Canon correct,and shutter lag was up there with > >SLR types. > > Correct. > > I believe the Pentax will have a CMOS sensor. Costs will simply not > allow > it to be equipped with a CCD. > > Cheers. > > Cot > > ____________________________________ > Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at > http://www.macads.co.uk/ > ____________________________________ > Oh, swipe me! He paints with light! > http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/ > ____________________________________ > >
