On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Timothy Sherburne wrote: > I'm not quite sure I'm following you here. Can you elaborate a bit more?
Unless you enlarge them to a square print, you'll be losing a portion of the negative as you make ideal enlargments which the 645 would otherwise enlarge to with no wasted negative. -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
