I think the most universal and mathematical number is '0'. Why that is, I don't know, but why should a number that supposedly has quantitative value represent 'nothing'. You can't put a value on something that does not exist, yet we do. It means nothing and is nothing, but we make it something. Just a thought.
Brad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 11:44 PM Subject: Re: Vs: Numbers and the Golden Section > Ok, That is it! > > From: > > http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/pi/pi.html > > an excerpt: > > Pi is one of the few concepts in mathematics whose mention evokes a response > of recognition and interest in those not concerned professionally with the > subject. It has been a part of human culture and the educated imagination > for more than twenty five hundred years. > > > Bob > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 3:37 PM > Subject: Re: Vs: Numbers and the Golden Section > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: T Rittenhouse > > Subject: Re: Vs: Numbers and the Golden Section > > > > > > > Another thing that is bothering me about all these threads: > > why is nobody > > > complaining about all these religion posts? > > > > We're busted. > > WW > > > >
