Not far off - but Plato�s theory was about ideas of things, not numbers. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 30. joulukuuta 2002 21:22 Aihe: Re: Vs: Numbers and the Golden Section >"Raimo Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Here we go again - another Pythagorean. > >Hmm, I would have said Platonist. > > >>-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- >>L�hett�j�: John Whicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>P�iv�: 30. joulukuuta 2002 20:22 >>Aihe: Re: Numbers and the Golden Section >> >> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 6:16 PM >>>Subject: Re: Numbers and the Golden Section >>> >>> >>>> Nope. Its absolutely clear what I mean. There is nothing philosophical >>>about >>>> it. I hold that Mathematics is an invention of man. >>> >>> >>>Hi Don, >>> >>>Mathematics was not *invented* by Man. >>> >>>It was *discovered*. >>> >>> >>>Best regards, >>> >>>John >>> > >-- >Mark Roberts >Photography and writing >www.robertstech.com >
