Hi Frank:
Thanks for your response. Sitting on the fence is often a good thing at least 
you are looking at both sides before you jump.
Actually, let's look at it from that perspective. If a photographer takes the 
time to learn the "guidelines of composition we'll call them (rules)" they 
can then climb up on the fence and decide which way they want to jump on any 
given image they are about to make. 
They can jump on the side where the rules are and make a very traditional 
image or they can jump on the side where there are no rules and make a 
non-traditional image. They could also stay on the fence and straddle both 
sides to create an image that is traditional but pushes the boundaries.
If they don't know the rules they don't know where to jump. Chances are it is 
a hit and miss — more often a miss than a hit.
Like I have said before, it helps to know the rules so that you can break 
them successfully. Rules are meant to be broken.

So, Frank, I don't see this as taking any side. Know the rules so you can 
break them. It's really quite simple....
Thomas Van Veen's headless bride is an excellent example of breaking the 
rules to create a non traditional image of a bride. His "reject" is a very 
well done traditional image of a bride. I like the one that breaks the rules. 
But judging from the "reject" image, I can tell that TV knows the rules of 
composition and knows when to break them successfully.
Vic 

Reply via email to