Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I don't know if we're talking about exactly the same thing. You see, I think >what you've done is an example of pure empiricism at work.
I think *all* the so-called "rules" are examples of pure empiricism at work. That's why in my earlier post I used the term "technique of thirds" rather than "rule of thirds". Perhaps I was, ahem, "barking" up the wrong tree? -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
