>> As I say, please send me your address. I'll send you some published writings >> on the matter. That is, if you like. > > This is pointless as you are either ignorant or being difficult
Huh? I have repeatedly explained my position on the matter, and a number of people have said that they either agree or else have enjoyed reading what I've written. You and I disagree on the matter. As I've _also_ said several times, that's well within the swing of my compass. I'm used to disagreement and I have no problem with it. Other people are certainly entitled to their opinions. >as you have never even tried to explain how you can make any meaning photograph >without abiding to the rules and principle that governs the human visual system I've also asked you repeatedly to state what those rules and principles _are_. If you'd like me to explain my position further, I'd be happy to, but it would help me to know what you're talking about. In any event, I've written a published essay that explains one part of my position at greater length and with greater clarity than is possible on the PDML. I don't see how refusing to take a look at it is going to help further your understanding of what I'm trying to say. --Mike
