RE: Least exspensive 4000-4800 dpi scanner

[Peter Alling]

I wouldn't count on that helping. New negs. seem to have dust and scratches the minute I put
them into the scanner.

At 10:04 AM 1/2/2003 -0500, you wrote:

model # ?

I wont need ICE/FARE as I'll be scanning
new clean negs.

JCO

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:23 AM
> To: INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Least exspensive 4000-4800 dpi scanner
>
>
> Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Anybody know what is the least expensive
> 35mm film scanner that has 4000-4800 dpi
> resolution?<
>
> the Canon seems to be the price leader. no Digital ICE though, something
> called FARE instead, and some people report here that enabling that makes
> the scanning VERY slow, about 3-4 times as long as i experience with
> Digital ICE at the same resolution.
>
> Herb....
>

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
    Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  --Groucho Marx