They arent any uncoated Vivitars. It had to have been at least single coated. I bet it would be a killer portrait lens when used near wide open outdoors.... JCO
> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Pearson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 12:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Vivitar 135 mm F/1.5?-Quick Help > > > Thanks Peter, > That's ok. I passed on it anyways, as I did not know > much about it. It ended up selling for around $92. > Did it really have an F1.5? If so, there can't be > many of those around, are there? > > > --- Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't see this until now, this lens is a T-mount > > preset lens > > from the 1960's probably un-coated. It was probably > > very expensive when > > it was introduced. Sorry I didn't get you this > > information soon enough. > > > > At 08:34 PM 1/7/2003 -0800, you wrote: > > >Quick: > > > > > >This auction ends in about 5 minutes. Anyone ever > > >used one of these? Is it any good? Hard to > > believe > > >it really is an F/1.5??? What is it worth? > > > > > >__________________________________________________ > > >Do you Yahoo!? > > >Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up > > now. > > >http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > > Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. > > Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. > > --Groucho Marx > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com >
