Maybe a few months isn't a big deal, but if you had purchased a digital camera from the same era as the PZ-1, I think everyone would agree that it is "out of date"!
t On 1/8/03 11:37 AM, Cotty wrote: >> DSLR sell so slowly and are so fast out of date > > This phrase is a non-sequitur. It does not mean a thing. I bought a DSLR > a few months ago, and if it is superseded at the PMA, fine. I would not > consider mine to be 'out of date', whatever that means. Would one > consider a PZ-1, or an LX, or a Spotmatic 'out of date' right now? If it > was in working order and being used, I would define that as very much 'in > date'! > > IMO the term 'out of date' is part of the gotta-have hype, is frankly > unhelpful, and should apply only to film, chemicals, and milk! > > Not getting specifically at you, Pal, I understand the way you used the > term, and what you meant by it. I simply produce a point of view > regarding it. > > Cotty (exp. 02/05) > > ____________________________________ > Oh, swipe me! He paints with light! > http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/ > ____________________________________ > Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at > http://www.macads.co.uk/ > ____________________________________ > >
