LOL! 

I've only been here a short time (seems like forever, but I think it's a month and a 
half to possibly two months), and that seems like a very accurate summation to me. 

(My favorites in your summation are asterisked.

In a message dated 1/8/2003 6:38:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> I certainly hope not. That would be rather limiting, not to mention
> unenforceable. We do have an unspoken rule, however, to ignore Bruce
> Rubenstein when he has one of his periodic attacks of dysphemism and cusses
> and insults other peoples' immediate female forebearers, and I plug my
> fingers in my ears and go WAH-WAH-WAH-WAH really loud when people start
> talking about guns. **We generally do our best to stay away from politics,
> mainly because the Republicans on the list are pathetically blind to how
> wrong they are and we don't want to antagonize them.** When the conversation
> devolves to alcoholic drinks, the LUG (Leica User Group) holds long
> discussions about single-malt whiskies. When we do, we talk about
> home-brewing beer. That about sums up the difference between the two groups.
> 
> Talking about home-brewing beer is on-topic because our list-owner is named
> "Brewer."
> 
> When the pooh-bahs of the list (I am NOT!) get into pissing matches about
> who knows more, it's considered good manners not to change the thread title
> so people can more conveniently delete the messages without reading them.
> 
> Pal sometimes sounds supercilious. This is okay, because for the most part
> his information is very good.
> 
> Cotty drinks, but we love him.
> 
> These are the topics we have already completely exhaused: whether the 50/1.7
> or the 50/1.4 is better; everything having to do with tripods; everything
> having to do with flash; everything having to do with lenses; everything
> having to do with camera bodies; everything having to do with the camera
> industry; everything having to do with film; everything having to do with
> processing; everything having to do with all existing Pentax products.
> 
> *The above list leaves off 781 things we have also already discussed to
> death.*
> 
>**The only reliable topic of conversation is predicting the future. This we do
> at great length and sometimes with great fierceness. The 
> less we actually
> know about anything, the better our discussion are.**
> 
> Take it from there. Once again, welcome to Kindergarten!
> 
> --Mike 

But I'd add -- and mostly everyone plays nice.

Doe aka Marnie ;-)

Reply via email to