On Saturday, January 11, 2003, at 09:57 AM, Jostein wrote:
But you wouldn't have to cool your digicam to liquid nitrogen or liquid helium extremes to see an improvement would you? Wouldn't CO2 be sufficient for non-astrophotograpy uses?...or approaching On Topic:From "A guide for the use of CCD's: #1 Where to start", found bygoogle at: http://www.starchaser-obs.com/Ot_art_1.htm "Cooling is extremely important. If you use a CCD at room temperature, thermal noise will add about 150 electrons per second per pixel. A typical pixel has the capacity for around 150,000 electrons. This means that in 17 minutes the CCD would be saturated by noise. For each decrease in 13 degrees F. the production of thermal electrons decreases by half. Therefore the cooler the unit, the longer the CCD can be exposed before saturation by thermal noise. Most CCD's have ThermoElectric cooling (TE). The best is liquid cooling, usually liquid nitrogen." Jostein :-)
Dan Scott (just guessing)

