Re: ScanDual III (was "Re: Mac Blat")

[Bruce Rubenstein]

Do the scans look sharper than from the HP? I assume the Minolta is much better than the HP for slides. Have you tried manually adjusting the focus? Was the Minolta softer than the Nikon (which model?) with the Minolta dust removal turned off? Do you find the much difference is the noise when using multi scan?

BR

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Sure, first lets qualify the environment... XP Pro, Pentium 4 @ 2 GHertz 80
GB HD for images. Acanner on a USB 2.0 channel.

I have used the HP s-20 original, an early Nikon scanner.

I find the software package to be quite stable and can scan into PS or into
a file. The software does take a little learning time to master, but nothing
real complicated.

The scans are quite good (K-64 and E-100S) good depth. I do find the scans a
bit softer than the Nikon, but on the other hand, dust doesn't stick out as
much... I like the minolta.

Got questions? Ask...