In a message dated 1/14/2003 4:08:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I'd leave this bit out. > > > > > > > It also takes okay pictures, not too bad, with no obvious distortions > > > until the zoom is extended to its maximum focal length, then it produces > > > swirlies. But the swirlies are not terrible, so it's adequate for the > > > student > > > > Especially the "adequate for the student" bit. > > You could leave the photo examples link in the description but drop the > > comment swirlies/no swirlies. Too psychadelic. > > Exactly. Let the buyer judge for him/herself. You've shown > them the > prints, now it's up to them. > > keith whaley Thanks everyone for their input. Hehehehe. Maybe I should target the aging hippie-photographer crowd. Special effect lens! Communicates that mellow stoned feel!!! Good advice, the photos will be there for truthfulness and I will take the comments out. (Remove comments from photos too.) I was/am also in a writing newsgroup group (well, a game newsgroup composed of writers and programmers). I know a writer would tell me to leave out the editorializing and just stick to the facts. Same thing here: Just describe the mechanics of the lens and leave out my judgment calls on what kind of pictures the lens produces. Besides I'd like to try to sell the @#$%! zoom. Thanks, Doe aka Marnie :-) That's the main thing, of course.
