On 16 Jan 2003 at 8:04, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: > For those who shoot a lot, digital is good enough right now. > For those who shoot a little, film is still better. > That's what the pros are telling me. > (And I can see the difference with my eyes. No math required.)
Hi Collin, You've hit the mail on the head, there's far more to the film vs digicam comparison than the grain non-issue. There is no way that direct digital will come near 67 film for a long stint, all I have to do is put nearly any of my Mamiya 7 slides under my 40x microscope, there's more information there than a 4000dpi scanner can hope to resolve. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
