----- Original Message -----
From: "T Rittenhouse"
Subject: Re: Kodak digital vs. 6x7 prints
>
> You did note the 6x7 was a D&P 8x10, not a custom print? I think they were
> of comparable quality.

This is both a fair and  an unfair comparisons, and I think it underlines
the real problem with traditional photography.
It is both difficult and expensive to get top quality repeatable results
from wet processing technology.
It is relatively easy to get top quality results from digitally processed
images.
Were this not so, the entire scanner/ inkjet photo industry would not have
taken off, and digital cameras would still be a megapixel.

William Robb


Reply via email to