david, I don't have one yet, but I would have the lab print them for my clients. Another way to consider it is based on volume. Home printing is great for single prints, but in volume it sucks rocks. Way too slow. So an occasional fine art print or proof could be done at home. But in quantity (same frame or lots of singles) the lab would be far cheaper on your time.
Bruce Monday, January 20, 2003, 9:22:52 AM, you wrote: dcsc> The recent DSLR thread (DSLR Lifespan) has me thinking. dcsc> For those of you who own one - and those of you who make money with it - dcsc> how do you get prints for your clients? dcsc> Do you get them "professionally done" by a lab or do you print them dcsc> yourselves? If you do get them done by a lab, at what charge? If you dcsc> print by yourself, how do you pass that cost along to your clients (i.e. dcsc> what do you charge for printing)? dcsc> It's just a curiosity of mine as I don't have a DSLR but I wonder what dcsc> people out there are charging who do have one. dcsc> Cheers, dcsc> Dave dcsc> -------------------------------------------------------------------- dcsc> mail2web - Check your email from the web at dcsc> http://mail2web.com/ .
