In a message dated 1/20/2003 1:46:53 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

> I believe that there is an optimal size of an image sensor which a balance 
> must be strike between the resolution, greater choice of DOF, optimal design 
> for both wide-angle and telephoto lenses, and the compactness of camera 
> body.  Eventually, digital camera will evolve into an optimal design, like 
> film sizes in traditional film camera. 
>
>[snip}
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Henry Chu
> 20/1/2003

I tend to agree with you and it was what I was trying to say the other day, but I did 
not express very well.

There is bound to be a point that one type of sensor is optimized, has the most 
information that it can gather with the least noise. And there is bound to be a point 
where one sensor is the optimal size and functionality for a particular camera. And if 
it's resolution is as good as film or even slightly better than film, that is a likely 
stopping place for most camera producing companies.

OTOH, I am not positive an industry-wide standard will evolve or whether each camera 
brand that remains standing in the digital age will have its own standard. Maybe 
that's not likely to happen because 35mm is now an industry standard and camera 
companies seem more oriented to the needs of photography and photographers than to the 
concerns of digital-lastest-bells-and-whistles computer geek types. So it seems the 
camera industry will probably follow its own path rather than emulating a computer 
path of competing "brands" and standards like Macs and PCs and Windows and Linux. We 
shall see.

If nothing else there are bound to be plateaus of technological development when 
optimized sensors are reached for a while. Maybe for a few years, 4-6, maybe longer. 
Personally, I also think at some point the amount of information a sensor can gather 
could exceed what one would need or what would even make a good photograph, so that's 
another reason that an industry-wide standard could evolve.

It will certainly be interesting to watch and to see what emerges. I am certainly 
interested in watching.

Doe aka Marnie ;-)

Reply via email to