I'll throw in my comments, I don't think the quality of the prints is in question anymore as much as the cost of the thing!
--- Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm in much the same mind, I can see my self > eventually owning a micro digital > > like the recently revealed Optio S for party snaps > and the like, a DSLR in > > 35mm > > format (preferably Pentax) and my Mamiya 7 67 kit. > It will be a long time > > before any digital camera delivers results like 67 > format film. > > > I got to see some prints made by the Kodak 14-mp > camera today. I was > favorably impressed--the 11x14 prints certainly > compared favorably to 35mm > enlargements, and would possibly be a serviceable > replacement for 645. The > colors were very pure, skies were clean, foliage > detail was good, resolution > was good, and edges were especially crisp. It didn't > quite look the _same_ > as film, but I can't see anyone who cares primarily > about pictures and print > quality being disappointed at this print size. > > --Mike > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
