Hi Rene,
The 135, as good as it is, can be easily bettered. Probably not
noticeably so when using standard colour negative film. The 28 is a
different story. This lens is one of Pentax's great lenses that has been
equalled but not really noticeably surpassed. It has a fat field and almost
no distortion - that is not an easy feat! Try and find 35 SMC Pentax f3.5
(not M) to go with it.
Regards,
Bob Rapp
----- Original Message -----
From: "E. van Ginkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:22 PM
Subject: RE: Pentax K-primes
> Hi,
>
> I understand I have got them cheap. Pentax secondhand-prices are lower in
> Europe then in the US. But what I want to know is how good are they
compared
> with the newer ones
>
> Rene
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Ken Archer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: maandag 20 januari 2003 16:25
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: Pentax K-primes
>
>
> If you are having any doubts, I will happily take them off your hands
> for the same amount of money plus shipping. ;-)
>
> On Monday 20 January 2003 09:07 pm, E. van Ginkel wrote:
> > I just bought two smc pentax K-primes (not M) a 3.5/135mm (35euro/U$)
> > and a 3.5/28mm (41euro/U$). Are these lenses any good? Is the price
> > right?
>
> --
> Ken Archer Canine Photography
> San Antonio, Texas
> "Business Is Going To The Dogs"
>
>
