Erwin wrote:
> I think the MZ5n introduction in Japan is to prepare for the future. I think
> it will become a "keeper", like the MZ-M.
[snip]
> In this line-up the MZ-2 would be the N80 etc.. competitor, while the MZ5n
> and the MZ-M position would be more towards a "timeless appeal", doing a
> hard to improve job of having the "right" features for little money.
I certainly agree with this. The MZ-M and MZ-5n are certainly timeless stayers. I
can't see what can be done to upgrade the MZ-5n and still stay with the concept. If
you add more AF points you probably have to change the interface in order to select
between them. And are the MZ-5n customer base interested in more AF points? Also, it
will mean an increase in price.
No, I have more faith in an MZ-2 or MZ-1 that complements the MZ-5n. This camera could
be a upgraded MZ-7 to more Z-1p-like feature set and interface.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
