> Mike, would you like me to quasi prove to you that you're never > going to buy digital then? > > You see, it really goes in cycles. You decide to buy a DSLR. Naturally > not the current one but the one that is going to be announced real > soon. Meanwhile, towards the same announcement some another tech > advancement leaks out. So you postpone your decision. Eventually that > advancement goes into production. Then cycle repeats itself. That's > the danger of digital. With film cameras it does not seem to be the > case. After all, film camera is just a black box with knobs and > buttons that exposes your film. > > No offense though. I really think that digitech advances way too > rapidly. I am afraid that each time digitech takes a step it really > hasn't passed enough time to take full advantage of current stuff. > > Again, I meant no disrespect.
None taken. You're only wrong about one thing: namely, that I happen to be still waiting to buy the perfect film camera, too. --Mike P.S. Still, I really like the idea of a digital with more dynamic range. I would buy something like a Fuji 602 with that sensor in it. Honest, I would.
