P�l Jensen wrote: > > So putting the image through a scanner that cannot do justice to > the film is considered "real world". With such test procedures you > can prove anything by simply putting up test procedures that fits > your preconceived ideas on how things should be.
If the only possibility to do justice to the film is to scan it at $300 a frame, then I do not consider that "real world". FOR ME and MY WALLET, real world is: a) 35 mm slide film, projected b) 35 mm slide film, scanned on a $1000 scanner, printed on a $300 ink jet c) digital image, printed on the $300 ink jet So, no, a drum scan is not real-world for me. Neither is chemical processing of medium format film. YOUR reality may differ... Cheers, Boz
