At 07:40 PM 1/31/2003 +0100, you wrote:
I have never seen PZ-1 marketed as a pro camera. The MX most certainly was, with comparison pictures with Nikon F2.
But how durable is the MX?
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti-----
L�hett�j�: P�l Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P�iv�: 30. tammikuuta 2003 12:56
Aihe: Re: LX Questions
>> The MX was marketed as a pro system also, and so was the PZ-1.
>
>
>
>There is a significant difference: the LX was specified for over 100 000 shutter cycles and throughly tested under severe conditions. I read an interview with the then Asahi boss, Minoru Suzuki, who explained in detail the philosophy behind the LX. It was meant as an answer to the Nikon F2 and Canon F1.
>
>P�l
>
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
