> No what it proves is that I can claim moral superiority with the best of them. > > To stand on a hill and claim I'm morally superior and therefor my facts are > unassailable is not an argument. > > To ascribe the worst motives to others and make your case with 'secret' > knowledge > is dishonest. > > If someone doesn't agree with your point of view they must be wrong, when they > point out uncomfortable facts you generalize their point to attack "their" > logic. > > Interesting rhetorical tools but not advancing the argument. But you're not > the > only one who can do this. > > You seem to dislike people challenging your moral authority. I suspect > that you hate > that more than anything else. > > I really don't care if you disagree with my logic, since after all it > wasn't mine to > start with.
Peter, You're either very confused or very confusing, one or the other. Go have a drink and get to bed early. You'll feel better in the morning. --Mike
