At 06:02 PM 2/4/2003 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>have you ever compared your A 200/4 ED macro lens with 105mm Nikkor or
>Canon 100mm or 200mm macro Nikkor/4?
>Do you think Pentax glass is better?
Have not used the other brands - from what I've seen, the Pentax 200mm
macros are among the best there are, if not the best.
>What about PZ1p and flash abilities?
I used the Pz-1p for some time before getting the Mz-S, and I still use a
Pz-1p for birds. The flash capabilities are excellent - you have a fast
maximum X-Synch speed (1/250th) and flash compensation built into the body.
>So if you shoot macro you measure background, compensate -1 or 1.5EV and
>then do fill-in flash?Or what? If you use A lens TTL of flash is possible
>as remember well.
It depends on the situation. For hand held macro shots flash is the main
source of light, with the tripod I either don;t use flash or use it only as
fill.
>Look here: http://www.grochowalski.pl/
Nice work!
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino
Kalamazoo, MI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - -
Photos:
http://www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - -
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs Alin Flaider
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs Kenneth Waller
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs Mark Cassino
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs Mike Johnston
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs frank theriault
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs Mark Cassino
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs Mike Johnston
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs frank theriault
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs frank theriault
- Re: Snow Crystal Photographs Mike Johnston
- Mark Cassino

