On 10 Feb 2003 at 11:10, Bruce Dayton wrote: > They could have just as easily been saying to her "Get your work done > by a professional photographer" as what you have interpreted to be a > poor camera/print.
Another pertinent question: Did she indicate that the print was shot on a digicam before they passed judgement? Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
