This doesn't mean that you have to use a digital camera, though. You could just as easily shoot with traditional film and provide them with scans that could still beat the quality you'd get from today's DSLR, even if they only keep 4MB.
t On 2/11/03 8:33 AM, Herb Chong wrote: > i just received the green light for an article on waterfalls. they want > digital originals where possible and their image specs are a high quality 4 > megapixel image. if i supply slides, they would scan and keep at no more > than 4 megapixels. they print on high quality glossy stock, about the same > as National Geographic uses. anyone who sells their images (as opposed to > prints) is being forced to go digital. stock agencies who don't won't have > buyers anymore because the graphic artists want digital. publications who > don't go digital for their image have trouble because the rest of their > publication process is digital. time is money.
