Peter,

You may want to check your Metz Flash manual instead of the LX manual.  I believe that 
the "automatic exposure check" function is different between Pentax TTL Flashes w/LX 
and Metz TTL Flashes w/LX.

I will check my manual later and make certain.

Regards,

Jose R. Rodriguez

> 
> From: Peter Smekal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/02/12 Wed AM 07:38:14 CST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LX + Mecablitz
> 
> Hi Bob,
> 
> Well, it doesn't matter if I fire the flash att f1.4 or f22. The behaviour
> is the same. Besides that, according to the LX manual it should flicker
> anyhow.
> 
> ???
> Peter
> 
> >Peter,
> >
> >Finder check goes on with the flash on bounce or with the 85/2 but not with
> >the 50/1.4 ? ! !   Have you watched the recycle time?
> >
> >Doesn't the finder check 'flicker' work only while the flash is recycling.
> >Once the flash capacitors have reached full charge, the light goes on
> >solidly.  So if you fire the flash with the 50mm at f1.4, the TTL doesn't use
> >much flash energy.  The recycle time is really short.  And, you don't get to
> >see the finder check 'flicker'.
> >
> >Try the 50mm at f16.
> >
> >Regards,  Bob S.
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >> After some advice from the list I managed to fix a SCA-372 hot-shoe for a
> >>  Metz Mecablitz 32 CT 3. With that shoe attached the flash is said to work
> >>  together with the LX in TTL-mode like any Pentax TTL flash (such as the
> >>  AF-200T, AF-280T or AF-400T). And so it seems. The red "X" led glowing when
> >>  the flash reaches full charge.
> >>
> >>  Only one thing is odd: the automatic exposure check in the viewfinder works
> >>  very erratic. It flickers for correct exposure when the reflector is tilted
> >>  uppwards, not when its in 'normal position'. In the same position/distance
> >>  to a possible motive that is. Why would that be? It shouldn't have anything
> >>  to do with the hot-shoe. What do you think, can the flash still be
> >reliable?
> >snip
> >>  Another clue: it has these problems with the M 50/1.4 and not with the M
> >>  85/2 lens - strange!
> 
> 
> Peter Smekal
> Uppsala, Sweden
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to