----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Johnston"
Subject: Re: Viewfinders on KX, KM, and K1000



> Sample variation for coverage makes no sense at all to me. I don't think
> they could do that if they tried. I can, however, believe that the spec
was
> changed from run to run, which would account for the lack of a published
> claim. (And maybe that amounts to the same thing Bill was trying to say.)

I guess not coverage per se, but what part of the negative matched the
screen image.

William Robb

Reply via email to