On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, [iso-8859-1] P�l Jensen wrote: > Nothing for us? Although I'm dissapointed by it's look as have heard > it was very stylish. I think it is ugly. Anyway, it is very feature
I won't go ugly, but it looks sort of like it wants to be a Canon camera with teh big wheel thingy on the back, and it pretends to be digital with the LCD...however..its not as ugly, to me, as the MZ-60. I'm surprised it didn't have the MZ-S's tilted back top plate, but I guess the bulk of the informationc oems from the screen on the back, and there was no need for that. > feel certain that every MZ-series camera will dissapear this year. Well, damnit, I don't WANT to buy an MZ-S, yet. > My guess is, with no basis whatsoever, is that they will show the Ist > digital sibling at the show proper. A new 67 and other new 35mm bodies > are reserved for later this year. Screw 67, I want them to give us thigns for 645 so I feel like I made the right investment. :) -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
