> Looks like Mike and Bruce are having another battle of wits. Bruce arguing > with Mike is like taking a knife to a gunfight. > > Bill
Thanks Bill but actually I wasn't trying to pick a fight, I am honestly just curious. Some people on the Leica Users Group tried to "shame" me this way, but it doesn't work with me--honestly I just don't feel that what users of other makes of camera think about my camera matters one bit. It doesn't matter to me, and I can't see why it should matter to them either. I mean, sometimes I've shot with an EOS Rebel or a Canonet, or point-and-shoots. If anything, I *like* cameras that don't look like much, because people take me less seriously and I can be more surreptitious. While it doesn't matter to me what I'm seen with, I know other people may feel differently. I was just wondering why Bruce would say "a camera has to be perceived as a flagship by owners of other brands have any credibility as a flagship." It seems a very curious statement to me. --Mike >>> Think about it. >>> >>> BR >>> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>>>> A camera has to be perceived as a flagship by owners of other brands > to >>>>> have any credibility as a flagship. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Why so, Bruce? >> >> >> You're the one who said it, I'd rather know what YOU think about it. Why >> does it matter what other people think?
