-----Original Message----- > From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > As expected, the 200/2.8 is better, mainly due to colour > > aberration of 70-210/4. > > But I'd say that the A 70-210/4 did OK, considering that it's an > inexpensive zoom and the FA* 200/2.8 is a very expensive prime.
Yeah, the 200/2.8 is a fantastic lens. Anything in the ballpark is pretty good. tv
