Yes,
Lots from 15mm to 200. The main diference between these cameras and the
spotties is that it begs for aperature priority whereas the spotties
encourage shutter priority.
Bob Rapp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Apilado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: ESII was Re: Mike's new column
> I love my ES and ES II's. Do you have any SMC Takumars?
>
> Jim A.
>
> > From: "Bob Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:53:44 +1100
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: ESII was Re: Mike's new column
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 19:53:06 -0500
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> > I finally got a ESII a... actually 2. I bought a black one and had it
> > repaired and then bought the chrome model in near new condition.
> > I must say, they are nice. However, it would change the way I normally
> > meter with the camera. Based on what I think of the camera, you should
have
> > no trouble moving on to the LX.
> >
> > Bob Rapp
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:34 AM
> > Subject: Re: Mike's new column
> >
> >
> >>> Hey, Mike, maybe I missed it, but have you handled a really nice MX? I
> > know
> >>> that former PDML contributor Shel Belinkoff had an LX or two for a
long
> >>> time and thought he didn't care for the MX because he had tried a real
> >>> beater one once, but when he finally tried a spiffy sample, he was won
> > over
> >>> -- especially since the MX is apparently much quieter than the LX.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks Joe, but let me try my spiffy sample of the LX before I go off
on
> > any
> >> more tangents....
> >>
> >> --Mike
> >>
> >
> >
>
