Robert wrote:
> After seeing the *ist D photos, which has some MZ-S influence, I bet you can > see the flagship slr. Huh? You mean the Pentax flagship should be a Nikon F80 clone? I'll certainly be dissapointed.... >Pentax will fix the MZ-S problems....add aperature > control, the great PZ-1p hyper modes, and hyper manual. In my opinion, the > MZ-S was close but lacked some key and unique PZ-1p features. The lack of > aperature control on the body was inexcusable. Certainly not. The MZ-S was intended as an upgrade path for the MZ-5n and maintained its interface. It was also intended as a basis for a high-end DSLR which would appeal to Pentax MF users, and LX users for that matter, and hence had matching interface. The *ist D is in a totally different ballpark marketing wise. P�l
