On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, William Robb wrote: > Umm, no. [snip] > Umm, no.
Damn, and I thought I understood this. Ok, then... why do digital shots appear to have more DOF than 35mm shots? chris
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, William Robb wrote: > Umm, no. [snip] > Umm, no.
Damn, and I thought I understood this. Ok, then... why do digital shots appear to have more DOF than 35mm shots? chris