Hi all,

Today I "pre-ordered" a Canon 10D for $1514.95 (with two-day delivery). The
decision to go "all digital" for color dictated having to choose which
company has the best long-term future in digital. Well, sorry to say,
there's not much contest among the "traditional" photographic companies.
Canon is emphasizing vertical integration for the digital market; when you
add that it can achieve genuine economies of scale for manufacturing digital
gear from chips through to bodies and lenses, you have a company that, in
the end, will only have, well, who? Perhaps Fuji and Sony as competitors?
(Certainly not Kodak or, for what can be seen now any Olympus/Kodak
partership.)

Of course, the *ist D is more elegant than the "elegant for Canon" 10D. But
the 10D is selling for $1500 right now at introduction. By the Fall selling
season it will be, what? At least $300 cheaper? And by then the Rebel-based
DSLR will be (how far?) under the magic $1000 mark. Pentax can't compete
with that kind of marketing if it's going to announce an entry-level DSLR at
the end of February but not have it on the shelf until late July.

Deciding to go for the "most features in smallest package" niche is fine IF
you have something genuinely innovative to offer either in aesthetically
slick packaging or in features. The *ist D is cute but it's not slick
enough, and the feature set while very good is not genuinely innovative.
Outside of the K-lens faithful there's nothing to hold one's attention.

And then there's Pentax's long history of pathetic marketing.

But where "jumping ship" hurts most is lenses. The most damning part of
"pre-PMA" is no new Limited, much less a body designed to the standards of
the existing Limiteds. There are promises for the fall. Canon delivers now.
And their AF lens line is simply superior.

So: I'll hang onto a ME Super SE and a few select lenses just to keep that
SMC "glow" in black and white (and sometimes in color too). But
realistically, Pentax's *ist is simply not realistic enough to compete with
Canon or idealistic enough to capture one's imagination.

Tom

Reply via email to