On March 2, 2003 12:21 am, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2003 at 22:23, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> > soft focus lenses as well as shift lenses are obsolete
> > due to photoshop IMHO.
>
> Of course in the case of emulating an 11mm shift in photoshop from a full
> frame 35mm film scan would mean that a significant portion of the original
> un-shifted image would become unusable/redundant, the compromises must be
> tolerable for your statement to have any relevance.
>
Obviously I'm missing something but I'll ask anyways. How is it possible to
shift after the picture is taken? Isn't that just cropping? Or do people glue
two pictures to make one?
Nick
