the *ist D looks pint-sized. R.I.P. Olympus...
--- Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's huge, take a look at the body with lens in some > ones hands. > > http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PHOTOKINA-2002/news/olympus/slr_uk.html > > It looks about the size of a Pentax 645. > > > At 09:33 PM 3/2/2003 -0600, you wrote: > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Peter Jansen" > >Subject: OT: Olympus 4/3 Digital SLR 'E System' on > Web > > > > > > > > > > > > See this link: > > > > > > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0303/03030212olympusesys.asp > > > > > > Looks bigger than the *ist D. Also these lenses > look > > > like the same size as other similra focal > lengths > > > (e.g. look at the 300mm f2.8 which = 600mm in > this > > > system). > > > > > > I'm not jumpin' ship for this. Looks like a > > > digicam/DZLR. Ugly. > > > >Neat camera. Olympus makes good stuff. A 300mm > f/2.8 is gonna be a big lens, > >no matter what goes onto the back of it. > >But, it's gonna fail, it looks too much like the > Contax 645 for anyone to be > >interested in it. > >Too bad. > >HAR!! > >WW > > Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. > Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. > --Groucho Marx > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
