I have been following the digital debate for some time now, but some of the things I don't understand are : 1] A DSLR needs a lens of a higher resolution capability than a film lens? Yes/No
2] All else being equal a 11-14MP DSLR image equals or betters a 35mm scan in some instances? Yes/No 3] If you used a full frame lens designed for a DSLR than all else being equal the digital image would better the 35mm scan in most instances? Yes/No 4] What would, assuming the above are all true , be then the result of using a high resolution lens on a SLR eg a MZS with ISO 100 B & W film, would the lens resolve too detail much for the film? Not trying to start an argument BTW..... Regards, Feroze
