On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Taz wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the MX so I can't accurately compare, but the ZX-M has
> been compared as the modern K1000.  It is a nice little camera, emphasis on
> little, but does not support autofocus or onboard flash if that is where you

I was going to pick up an ZX-M once, to augment my ZX-5n... The
incapability to manually focus made me move on.

I don't think I would suggest this camera, although, truthfully, I've
never used one..

> about the ZX-5n, however the ratings seem excellent.  I personally have 2

I believe the ZX-M is the same as the ZX-5, which was then superceded by
the ZX-5n. For the most part its the same camera, I think there's some
layout changes, plus autobracketing, spot meter, and (of course) AF on the
-5n.

> complaints about the ZX series, they are TOO LIGHT and certajn models do not

TOO light? You, evidently, have never worn one strapped around your neck
for 12 hours straight.. :)

Most people recommend the Battery Grip Fg for the ZX bodies. It does make
it seem much bigger and easier to handle, however, it does also make it
quite a bit heavier..and, obviously, YMMV. :)

> support the K(m) mount lenses(namely ZX-50 for one).  I shake too much with
> them, but they are good cameras.

The ZX-50, ZX-30, and ZX-60 all have crippled mounts. The -50 will fire
the shutter of any non A series lens, but will not meter with it. The 30
and 60 won't even fire the shutter with a non A lens.

> In bright sunlight the high shutter speeds can be wonderful assets.  I have
> speeds up to 1/8000 in pentax and even a 1/12000 in a minolta body.  If you
> want to blur your background in a portrait type image in bright sunlight
> you'll need the fast speeds to run f2 range aperatures.

Bah! Slower film! ;)

Really, though, I've never experienced a problem with my ZX-5n's 1/2000
top speed, even though I routinely shoot wide open at f1.4. I do, however,
stick primarily with ISO100 film.

Figure if its really a problem, you can use an ND or even a polarizing
filter...


-- 
http://www.infotainment.org       <->     more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com    <->     photography and portfolio.

Reply via email to