Two replies in one...

Kevin Waterson wrote:

> The scanner is sensational, [...]

Thanks for the comments.

> I have nothing but good things to say about this as a 35mm scanner, would
> have been nice to have had a MF scan built in, I have tried to modify it
> to accept a MF neg but it does not scan the whole neg, just a little over
> 38mm of it.

I already have a MF (and LF) capable scanner but it does top out at only 
1200ppi.  Thats no big deal at this stage: it was very well priced for 
its capabilities and in theory I can get a good print from 6x7, up to 
about 12x18" (so far I've only tried up to 8x10).

Then Paul Jones wrote:

> Its a good scanner, little bit noisey at 4000dpi.

Yes. I've seen on some reviews that it picks up the film grain.  I am 
sure this can be dealt with.  I'm very impressed by the shadow detail it 
can pick out.

> Its useless with Kodachromes for some reason.

No problem there, I only use E6 for slides.

> A 4000dpi file is about 60meg uncompress TIF.

I have plenty of memory and disk space so thats no problem either.  In 
fact I'm thinking of trying to stitch 24x68mm panoramas together at full 
res.  I understand this can be done, at least with Vuescan.  Its a pity 
the scanner can't do them in one pass.

> If your in a high speed link i can put a compressed tiff file up for you
> to download.

No need... I've only recently upgraded to a 56k modem :(

Cheers,

- Dave

http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/


Reply via email to