Hi Yoshihiko,

I plan to use it mainly for landscapes, although it will surely get used for
numerous occasions.  I'm not sure how important the extra stop over the 28mm
will be, but its always handy.

I think it will make a good companion for the FA 28-70  f/4 AL i have.

I do also have a 28mm F2.8 mf vivitar lense which is surprisingly sharp.

Thanks


From: "Yoshihiko Takinami" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 10:27 PM
Subject: Re: FA 28 2.8 versus FA 24 2.0


> Hi Paul,
>
> At 3 Mar 2001 16:11:03 +1100,
> "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote;
>
> > I think i'll buy the FA 24 2.0, it sounds much better :)
>
> I agree that FA*24/2 is better optically.   But again I
> must point out that the choice depends on what kind of
> photos you want to take.
>
> > what is the build quality like? I dont actualy own any FA series
> > lenses at the moment, only F.
>
> I prefer usual FA lenses to FA* lenses in point of built
> quality, though both of them are better than F lenses,
> IMHO.
>
> I do not like the clutch mechanisms of FA* lenses much,
> because I doubt their durabilities.   Though the idea of
> clutch mechanism itself seems nice.
>
> Hope this helps.
> --
> Yoshihiko Takinami
> Osaka, Japan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to