Nothing wrong with small and inexpensive cameras. If I want a large and expensive camera, I'll use my 67 and get a larger negative. If I wanted or needed a 35mm robocamera, I'd buy a Nikon. I'm not bitter about Pentax's decision not to make an F5 clone. And people seem to keep buying the MZ's, so as long as they do that, Pentax has money to spend to come out with things like the AF 645N II, 67II, and the Limited lenses. Works for me.
chris On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Bruce Rubenstein wrote: > The real reason Pentax is still in business: "I want it cheap, little, > light and cheap!" > > BR > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I'm not cheap, but I want the optics to be. :-).. > > > >
