Hi, But if I use it mostly for landscapes and shoot from f=4 the results should be great I hope. So even at 2.8 is not so good but probably better than 2.8 version full open. Thank you! Alek PS Is it similar to FA version if performance is concerns?FA lens got great reviews...
Użytkownik alexanderkrohe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:04:40 EST >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>> << \'ve never handled the 35mm A version but in >general you can assume that optically it will be at >least the equal of the M and somewhat inferior in >build and focus feel.There are exceptions but not >many. >> >>> >> My dear boy. This is one of them. Despite the fact >that they are >> significantly less common than the M lenses, the >A35mm F2 handles like >> a dream. Mind you, I haven\'t shot it. >> Kind regards >> >> Peter > >I have the A35mm/f2: Yes, it is an all metal >construction with excellent built quality. Stopped >down to 4 and smaller pictures show extremely high >contast and very high color saturation with beautiful, >slightly warmish colors. I like it for landscape shots >(amongst others). >On the down side: It seems to lack detail; wide open >performance is not particularly good (outer margins >unsharp, coma wings around light sources; still >visible at f2.8). >The lens seems to show what Mike Johnston describes as >"high large structure contrast" in his "Lens Contrast >And the Basics of MTF" article. >Yes, the optical construction is identical to that of >the M-version but it has a different coating. >Enjoy, >Alexander > >__________________________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online >http://webhosting.yahoo.com >
