I see very little difference between the Nikon and Minolta DS III on slides. The Nikon does seem to show more dirt though.
- Bob > [Original Message] > From: Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 3/15/2003 3:06:58 PM > Subject: Re: Scanner question - Minolta Dual Scan III > > real ICE can tell the difference between dust and black specs in the distance on the slide. E6 and C-41 type films are transparent to infrared while the dust isn't. the infrared scan channel tells the scanner software where there is dust, mildew, or similar obstruction. the image itself is transparent to infrared. > > Herb.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Zwarick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 17:48 > Subject: RE: Scanner question - Minolta Dual Scan III > > > > I have a DS III and find that its "ICE" works quite well. There are those > > who say it isn't a "real" ICE whatever that means, however the end result > > is quite good. >
