Brucey... my changing of the subject was to attract the attention of Brendan Bhaghan, a local, and shorter than myself, Toronto user.
He was the poster to which you were replying. I planned on letting him listen to the USM in comparison to his Pentax offerings. Cheers, Dave Original Message: ----------------- From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:48:46 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Brendan's Ears (Was:Re: Good-bye Pentax (was: Pentax needs USMand IS)) Huh? I have no idea of what you are referring to. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Remind me to let you listen to mine when we meet next... >Hopefully by that time I'll also have the Tokina and you can then listen to >the difference. > >Cheers, >Dave > >Original Message: >----------------- >From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:40:45 -0500 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Good-bye Pentax (was: Pentax needs USM and IS) > > >This point was discussed years ago by Canon nature and wildlife shooters >on photo.net and there was no problem with ultra sonic lens noise. > >BR > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
